Background
In January 2022, Douglas Loil Tankersley pleaded guilty to thirteen counts of possession of child pornography, charged as third-degree felonies under Texas Penal Code § 43.26(c-1). The State also proceeded on an enhancement alleging a prior felony conviction for assault against a public servant, which elevated each count to a second-degree felony. Under a plea agreement, the trial court placed Tankersley on deferred adjudication community supervision for ten years rather than imposing immediate prison sentences.
In January 2025, the State filed a motion to revoke Tankersley’s deferred adjudication, alleging numerous violations of his community supervision conditions. After filing a second amended motion to revoke in June 2025, the trial court held a hearing on August 21, 2025, found multiple allegations true, and revoked the deferred adjudication. The trial court then adjudicated Tankersley guilty and sentenced him to twenty years imprisonment on each count, to be served consecutively.
The Court’s Holding
The Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment in its entirety. Tankersley’s appellate counsel filed an Anders brief, indicating no reversible error existed. The court conducted a full independent review of the record and found nothing that would arguably support an appeal. The court found that consecutive sentencing was permissible under Texas Penal Code § 3.03(b)(3)(A), which allows consecutive sentences for multiple child pornography convictions arising from the same criminal episode.
The court granted counsel’s motion to withdraw and ordered counsel to notify Tankersley of his right to file a petition for discretionary review with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days.
Key Takeaways
- Deferred adjudication can be revoked when a defendant violates supervision conditions, subjecting them to the original sentencing exposure.
- Consecutive sentences are permissible for multiple child pornography counts arising from the same criminal episode.
- Prior felony convictions for offenses against public servants can trigger sentence enhancements for unrelated crimes.
Why It Matters
This decision is routine appellate affirmance in a child sexual abuse material possession case, following Anders v. California procedures for frivolous appeals. It reinforces that revocation of deferred adjudication—conditional probation without guilt adjudication—is a viable enforcement mechanism when defendants violate supervision terms, even years after the initial plea.
The case illustrates how prior violent offenses can create lasting sentencing consequences. Tankersley’s prior assault conviction against a public servant elevated his child pornography charges from third-degree to second-degree felonies, significantly increasing his potential exposure and the consecutive sentences imposed.
✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.