Lee v. State of Florida — Court affirmed the lower court’s decision without written opinion

Case
Sean D. Lee v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
KELSEY (Rick Scott, 2015); NORDBY (Ron DeSantis, 2019)
Date Decided
June 30, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-0731
Topics
Appellate procedure, Florida law, Per curiam affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Sean D. Lee appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Alachua County, with Judge James Matthew Colaw presiding. Lee was represented by the Public Defender’s office through Assistant Public Defender Megan Lynne Long. The State of Florida was represented by the Attorney General’s office.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision. The court issued a per curiam opinion without written explanation of its reasoning. Judges Kelsey, Nordby, and Neff concurred in the affirmance.

This decision is not final pending potential motions under the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Key Takeaways

  • The lower court’s judgment was upheld on appeal
  • No written opinion explaining the court’s rationale was issued
  • The affirmance is subject to further appellate motions

Why It Matters

As an unpublished per curiam affirmance without substantive opinion, this decision provides no precedential guidance and offers limited insight into the court’s reasoning. Without access to the lower court record or the issues on appeal, the practical impact of this affirmance cannot be assessed from the opinion alone.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top