Williams v. State — First District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Carlton Williams Sr v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
OSTERHAUS (Rick Scott, 2013); ROBERTS (Charlie Crist, 2007)
Date Decided
July 17, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-0236
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance, Pro Se Litigation
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Carlton Williams Sr appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Alachua County, where Judge James M. Colaw presided. Williams represented himself on appeal, and the State of Florida was represented by the Attorney General’s office.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the underlying proceedings, the issues Williams raised, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the merits. Chief Judge OSTERHAUS and Judges ROBERTS and NORDBY concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The disposition was per curiam and contained no written analysis.
  • The opinion does not identify the claims presented or establish a stated rule of law.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but offers no explanation that attorneys can use to evaluate the appellate court’s reasoning. Its practical significance is therefore limited to the disposition of Williams’s appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top