Douglas — affirmed the judgment without a written opinion

Case
Jeremy Douglas v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
ROBERTS (Charlie Crist, 2007); NORDBY (Ron DeSantis, 2019)
Date Decided
July 17, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-2089
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance, Florida Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jeremy Douglas appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Dixie County, where Judge Fred L. Koberlein, Jr., presided.

The First District’s opinion does not identify the underlying charges, the issues Douglas raised, or the arguments presented by the parties.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without analysis or explanation. Judges Roberts, Nordby, and Neff concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment remains in place.
  • The appellate court provided no written reasoning or discussion of the issues.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

Because the court affirmed without a written opinion, the decision resolves Douglas’s appeal but offers no explanation of the governing law or the panel’s reasoning.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top