Wright v. State — affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Mikell T. Wright v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Rowe (Charlie Crist, 2009); WINOKUR (Rick Scott, 2015)
Date Decided
July 15, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-1430
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Mikell T. Wright appealed a judgment of the Circuit Court for Dixie County, where Judge Fred Koberlein, Jr. presided. Wright was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office, and the State of Florida was represented by the Attorney General’s Office.

The First District’s opinion does not identify Wright’s conviction, sentence, appellate arguments, or the facts underlying the case.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court supplied no reasoning or discussion of the issues raised. Judges Rowe, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas concurred in the decision.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the judgment against Wright.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without a written explanation.
  • The opinion establishes no stated rationale addressing the facts or legal issues presented on appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s judgment intact but provides no guidance about the merits of Wright’s arguments or the appellate court’s reasoning. Attorneys therefore cannot rely on the opinion for a stated rule beyond its case-specific affirmance.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top