Eady — affirmed the trial court without a written opinion

Case
Howard Lamont Eady v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
JAY (Ron DeSantis, 2023); LAMBERT (Rick Scott, 2014)
Date Decided
July 16, 2026
Docket No.
5D2024-0994
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance, Florida Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Howard Lamont Eady appealed from proceedings in the Circuit Court for Volusia County before Judge Leah R. Case. The appeal arose from lower-tribunal case numbers 2023-300315-CFDB and 2023-300316-CFDB.

The Fifth District’s opinion does not describe the charges, facts, procedural history, issues raised on appeal, or arguments of the parties. Eady was represented on appeal by Ann M. Phillips, and the State was represented by Attorney General James Uthmeier and Assistant Attorney General Kaylee D. Tatman.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment. It issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation of its reasoning.

Chief Judge Jay and Judges Lambert and MacIver concurred. Because the court provided no analysis, the opinion establishes only that the challenged judgment was affirmed; it does not identify which arguments were rejected or announce a substantive rule of law.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.
  • The decision was unanimous and issued per curiam without an explanatory opinion.
  • The opinion supplies no factual account, legal analysis, or statement of the appellate issues.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the lower court’s judgment in place but provides attorneys no substantive reasoning to apply in other cases. Its significance is therefore principally case-specific.

The opinion states that it is not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top