In re Goss — Mandamus petition denied for an inadequate record

Case
In re Sharon Goss, Geneva Morris, Beverly Morris, Aver Partner, and Anthony Partner
Court
Texas First Court of Appeals
Judge
Not specified
Date Decided
July 16, 2026
Docket No.
01-26-00683-CV
Topics
Mandamus; Appellate Procedure; Probate; Jurisdiction
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Sharon Goss, Geneva Morris, Beverly Morris, Aver Partner, and Anthony Partner sought mandamus relief in an original proceeding arising from a case pending before Judge Erica R. Hughes in the 151st District Court of Harris County.

The relators challenged separate trial-court orders denying their pleas to the jurisdiction, motions to transfer the case to probate court, and motion to abate the proceedings. They also filed a motion asking the court of appeals to stay the underlying proceedings on an emergency basis.

The Court’s Holding

The Texas First Court of Appeals denied the mandamus petition without reaching its merits. The per curiam court held that the relators failed to provide the record required for consideration of mandamus relief under Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 52.7(a)(1) and 52.7(a)(2).

Those rules required certified or sworn copies of every material document filed in the underlying proceeding, as well as a properly authenticated transcript of relevant testimony and exhibits—or a statement that no testimony was taken in connection with the challenged matters. Because the petition did not satisfy those requirements, the court denied relief and dismissed all pending motions, including the emergency-stay motion, as moot.

Key Takeaways

  • A mandamus petitioner must supply certified or sworn copies of all documents material to the requested relief.
  • The record must also include properly authenticated relevant testimony and exhibits, or state that no testimony was taken.
  • An inadequate mandamus record can result in denial without any consideration of the petition’s substantive arguments.

Why It Matters

The decision underscores that mandamus relief depends on strict compliance with appellate-record requirements. Even challenges involving subject-matter jurisdiction, probate-court transfer, or abatement may go unreviewed if the relator does not furnish the materials needed to evaluate them.

Practitioners seeking emergency relief should verify the completeness and authentication of the mandamus record before filing, because denial of the petition can also render an accompanying stay request moot.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top