Potter v. State — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Johnathan Lee Potter v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
KELSEY (Rick Scott, 2015); LONG (Ron DeSantis, 2020)
Date Decided
July 21, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-1749
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Johnathan Lee Potter appealed from a judgment or order of the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County, where Judge Clifton A. Drake presided. The opinion does not identify the charges, the challenged ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal.

Potter was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office. The State was represented by the Attorney General’s Office.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion. Judges Kelsey, Long, and Treadwell concurred.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the facts or legal issues. The decision was designated not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying charges, appellate claims, or legal grounds for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s decision in place but supplies no written analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases. Its practical significance is therefore principally to the parties and the disposition of this appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top