Colon-Hernandez — affirmed the circuit court without a written explanation

Case
Jeffrey Colon-Hernandez v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
WALLIS (Rick Scott, 2013); EDWARDS (Rick Scott, 2014)
Date Decided
July 21, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-3498
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jeffrey Colon-Hernandez appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Hernando County, where Circuit Judge Daniel B. Merritt, Jr. presided. The appellate opinion identifies the lower-tribunal case number as 2020-MH-000459-A.

The Fifth District Court of Appeal’s brief opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the nature of the circuit court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam ruling.

The court provided no written reasoning or discussion of the legal issues. Judges Wallis, Edwards, and Boatwright concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s ruling was affirmed.
  • The decision was issued per curiam and contains no explanation of the court’s reasoning.
  • The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s decision in place but supplies no articulated legal rule or factual analysis. Because the court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion itself offers no guidance about how the Fifth District evaluated the issues raised in the appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top