Schoolcraft v. State — affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Randy Eugene Schoolcraft, Sr. v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
WOZNIAK (Ron DeSantis, 2023); SMITH (Ron DeSantis, 2022)
Date Decided
July 21, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-0275
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Randy Eugene Schoolcraft, Sr. appealed from the Circuit Court for Collier County, where Judge Joseph G. Foster presided over three lower-tribunal criminal cases numbered 2022-CF-001752, 2022-CF-001792, and 2022-CF-001838.

The appellate opinion does not describe the charges, the proceedings below, Schoolcraft’s arguments on appeal, or the State’s response.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation or discussion of the legal issues. Judges Wozniak, Smith, and Mize concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the judgment under review.
  • The decision was unanimous and issued per curiam.
  • The opinion provides no reasoning, factual discussion, or statement of the appellate issues.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s judgment in place. Because the court supplied no reasoning, the opinion does not announce or explain a legal rule for future cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top