State v. Verdin — denied a repeat request to review the rejection of postconviction relief

Case
State of Louisiana v. Desmond Devonte Verdin
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit
Judge
Theriot (appointment info not available); Lanier (appointment info not available)
Date Decided
July 13, 2026
Docket No.
2026 KW 0531
Topics
Postconviction Relief, Supervisory Writs, Criminal Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Desmond Devonte Verdin sought supervisory review of proceedings in the 32nd Judicial District Court for Terrebonne Parish, where his case was docketed as No. 810397. The district court had denied his application for postconviction relief in August 2025.

Verdin previously filed a counseled writ application asking the First Circuit to review that ruling. The court denied the earlier application in State v. Verdin, 2025-0949 (La. App. 1st Cir. Jan. 9, 2026), 2026 WL 127111 (unpublished).

The Court’s Holding

The First Circuit denied Verdin’s present supervisory writ application. The brief disposition noted that he had previously sought review of the same August 2025 ruling and that the court had already denied his earlier writ application.

The court did not provide additional reasoning, discuss the substance of Verdin’s postconviction claims, or disturb the district court’s denial of postconviction relief.

Key Takeaways

  • The First Circuit denied Verdin’s supervisory writ application.
  • Verdin had previously filed a counseled application seeking review of the same August 2025 postconviction ruling.
  • The court offered no substantive analysis of the underlying postconviction claims.

Why It Matters

The disposition illustrates the limited relief available through a renewed supervisory writ request after an appellate court has already denied review of the same postconviction ruling. Because the court supplied no substantive analysis, the decision provides no new guidance on the merits of Verdin’s claims or Louisiana postconviction law.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top