Chaney v. Roshto — Rehearing denied

Case
Jamie Lynne Chaney v. Richard Albert Roshto
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal, Third Circuit
Judge
Sharon Darville Wilson (appointment info not available); Gary J. Ortego (appointment info not available)
Date Decided
July 15, 2026
Docket No.
25 00725-CA
Topics
Rehearing; Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jamie Lynne Chaney, appearing in proper person, appealed in litigation against Richard Albert Roshto arising from Lafayette Parish Case No. 20130901. The rehearing notice does not describe the underlying dispute, the appellate court’s earlier decision, or the arguments raised on appeal.

After the appellate disposition, Chaney filed an application for rehearing in the Louisiana Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. The matter was before Judges Sharon Darville Wilson, Gary J. Ortego, and Clayton Davis.

The Court’s Holding

The court denied Chaney’s application for rehearing on July 15, 2026. The notice provides no reasoning or further discussion of the application.

The rehearing action therefore left the court’s prior disposition in place. The notice itself did not alter or explain that disposition.

Key Takeaways

  • The Third Circuit denied Chaney’s application for rehearing.
  • The court issued no explanation for the denial.
  • The rehearing notice supplies no details about the underlying claims or the court’s prior appellate ruling.

Why It Matters

The denial ends the rehearing request before this appellate panel and leaves its earlier ruling undisturbed. Because the notice contains no substantive analysis, it offers no new guidance on the underlying legal issues.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top