Crocker v. Guerrero — vacated a defective appeal certificate and dismissed the habeas appeal

Case
Brandon Earl Crocker v. Eric Guerrero, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Judge
Clement (George W. Bush, 2001); Haynes (George W. Bush, 2008)
Date Decided
July 23, 2026
Docket No.
25-40747
Topics
Habeas Corpus, Appellate Jurisdiction, Certificate of Appealability, Rule 60(b)
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Texas prisoner Brandon Earl Crocker filed an application for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court dismissed the application as untimely.

Crocker subsequently sought relief from the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). After the district court denied that motion, Crocker appealed both the dismissal of his habeas application and the denial of Rule 60(b) relief. He also moved for appointment of counsel.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth Circuit held that it lacked jurisdiction to review the dismissal of Crocker’s § 2254 application because Crocker did not timely appeal the underlying judgment. His timely appeal from the denial of his Rule 60(b) motion did not confer jurisdiction to review that earlier judgment.

The court further determined that the certificate of appealability issued by the district court was defective because it addressed only a procedural issue. The court declined to issue a valid certificate in its place because Crocker could not satisfy the statutory requirements for a certificate of appealability concerning the denial of Rule 60(b) relief. It therefore vacated the certificate, dismissed the appeal, and denied the motion for appointment of counsel.

Key Takeaways

  • A timely appeal from the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion does not cure an untimely appeal from the underlying habeas judgment.
  • A certificate of appealability addressing only a procedural issue is defective under Fifth Circuit precedent.
  • When the petitioner cannot meet the statutory certificate-of-appealability standard, the Fifth Circuit may vacate a defective certificate and dismiss the appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision underscores that habeas petitioners must timely appeal the underlying judgment if they want appellate review of that judgment. A later Rule 60(b) motion cannot serve as a substitute for a timely notice of appeal.

It also highlights the need for a certificate of appealability to satisfy the governing statutory requirements rather than authorize review of a procedural question alone.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top