Goodwin v. State — conviction and sentence affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Ryan James Goodwin v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
LUCAS (Rick Scott, 2014); SILBERMAN (Jeb Bush, 2001)
Date Decided
July 29, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-1969
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Ryan James Goodwin appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, where Judge Susan St. John presided.

The appellate court’s brief opinion does not identify the charges, describe the underlying facts, specify the issues raised on appeal, or detail the relief Goodwin requested.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without analysis or a written explanation of its reasoning. Chief Judge Lucas and Judges Silberman and Smith concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment remains in effect.
  • The appellate court provided no factual discussion or legal analysis.
  • The opinion establishes no express rule beyond the disposition of this appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this stage of Goodwin’s appeal in the Second District, leaving the lower court’s judgment undisturbed. Because the court did not explain its reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the legal issues that may have been presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top