Randazzo — affirmed the Okeechobee County School Board’s decision without a written opinion

Case
Rose Randazzo v. Ken Kenworthy, Superintendent of Schools of Okeechobee County School Board
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gross (Lawton Chiles, 1995); LEVINE (Charlie Crist, 2009)
Date Decided
July 30, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-2981
Topics
School Board; Administrative Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Rose Randazzo appealed from a decision of the Okeechobee County School Board in Case No. 2023-01. Ken Kenworthy, identified as Superintendent of Schools of the Okeechobee County School Board, was the appellee.

The Fourth District’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the School Board’s ruling, the arguments on appeal, or the applicable legal issues.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the School Board’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam decision consisting only of the disposition “Affirmed.” It provided no reasoning, announced no express rule of law, and did not identify the grounds supporting affirmance. Judges Gross, Levine, and Forst concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District left the Okeechobee County School Board’s decision in place.
  • The per curiam opinion provides no factual discussion or legal analysis.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends the appeal in the School Board’s favor unless further review or rehearing changes the result. Because the court did not explain its reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance about the underlying dispute or the legal issues presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top