Brown v. Regan — affirmed the circuit court without a written explanation

Case
Megan Brown and Performance Insurance Group, Inc. v. Joseph Regan
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
CIKLIN (Charlie Crist, 2008); Conner (Rick Scott, 2011)
Date Decided
July 30, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-1826
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Megan Brown and Performance Insurance Group, Inc. appealed an order or judgment entered by the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. Circuit Judge Daniel A. Casey presided over the underlying case, docketed as No. 062015CA017984AXXXCE.

The appellate opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, the nature of the challenged ruling, the arguments raised on appeal, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling. The court issued a per curiam decision consisting only of the word “Affirmed.”

Because the court provided no written analysis, the opinion states no legal rule or rationale. Judges Ciklin, Conner, and Klingensmith concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without an explanatory opinion.
  • The opinion does not identify the issues presented or provide precedential reasoning.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s disposition in place, subject to any timely motion for rehearing. Its practical significance beyond the parties is limited because the appellate court did not explain its reasoning or announce a rule of law.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top