Huckleby — Fourth District affirmed the circuit court without a written explanation

Case
Aimee Huckleby v. Anson Huckleby
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gross (Lawton Chiles, 1995); LEVINE (Charlie Crist, 2009)
Date Decided
July 30, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-1770
Topics
Family Law, Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Aimee Huckleby appealed from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, where Judge Dina Keever-Agrama presided. The appellate opinion does not identify the nature of the underlying dispute or the specific ruling challenged.

Lauren E. Wages of Vette Law PLLC represented Aimee Huckleby. Anson Huckleby appeared pro se.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the facts, issues, or applicable law. Judges Gross, Levine, and Forst concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion establishes no stated rule of law and does not disclose the basis for the appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal in the appellee’s favor, subject to disposition of any timely motion for rehearing. Because the court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the underlying family-law issues.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top