Texas Ass’n of Business v. FCC — Sixth Circuit granted rehearing en banc and vacated its prior ruling

Case
Ohio Telecom Association; Texas Association of Business; CTIA–The Wireless Association, NCTA–The Internet & Television Association, and USTelecom–The Broadband Association v. Federal Communications Commission; United States of America
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Judge
SUTTON (George W. Bush, 2003); MOORE (Bill Clinton, 1995); CLAY (William J. Clinton, 1997); GRIFFIN (George W. Bush, 2005); Kethledge (George W. Bush, 2008); THAPAR (Donald Trump, 2017); BUSH (Donald Trump, 2017); LARSEN (Donald J. Trump, 2017); NALBANDIAN (Donald J. Trump, 2018); READLER (Donald J. Trump, 2019); MURPHY (Donald J. Trump, 2019); DAVIS (Joseph R. Biden, 2022); MATHIS (Joseph R. Biden, 2022); BLOOMEKATZ (Joseph R. Biden Jr., 2023); RITZ (Joseph R. Biden, 2024); HERMANDORFER (Donald Trump, 2025)
Date Decided
July 31, 2026
Docket No.
24-3133/3206/3252
Topics
Rehearing En Banc, Appellate Procedure, FCC
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Several telecommunications trade associations petitioned for review in consolidated proceedings involving the Federal Communications Commission and the United States. Hamilton Relay, Inc. intervened in one of the proceedings.

After a Sixth Circuit panel issued a decision and judgment, the petitioners sought rehearing en banc. The full court considered whether to rehear the consolidated cases.

The Court’s Holding

A majority of the Sixth Circuit’s judges in regular active service voted to grant rehearing en banc.

Under Sixth Circuit Rule 40(d), that decision vacated the court’s previous opinion and judgment, stayed the mandate, and restored the case to the docket as a pending appeal. The court directed the clerk to obtain supplemental briefing and schedule oral argument as soon as possible.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth Circuit granted rehearing en banc in the consolidated FCC proceedings.
  • The prior panel opinion and judgment no longer have effect because they were vacated.
  • The mandate is stayed, and the merits remain pending before the en banc court.

Why It Matters

The order eliminates the prior panel decision as the operative ruling and places the dispute before the full Sixth Circuit. Any substantive outcome must await supplemental briefing, en banc oral argument, and a new decision.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top