Reid v. State — affirmed the trial court without a written explanation

Case
Jason Allen Reid v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
SMITH (Ron DeSantis, 2022); MIZE (Ron DeSantis, 2022)
Date Decided
August 4, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-0913
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Postconviction Procedure, Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jason Allen Reid, representing himself, appealed from the Circuit Court for Polk County, where Circuit Judge Cassandra L. Denmark presided. The appellate docket identifies the lower-tribunal case as No. 2003-CF-001758.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The opinion does not describe Reid’s underlying conviction, the relief he sought, the claims he raised, or the trial court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

In a per curiam decision, the Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The court provided no analysis or explanation for the affirmance. Judges Smith, Mize, and Pratt concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the Polk County circuit court’s ruling.
  • The appeal was considered under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).
  • Because the court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion states no legal rationale or new rule of law.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but offers no written guidance about the merits of Reid’s claims. Attorneys therefore should not read the opinion as resolving any legal issue beyond the disposition of this particular appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top