Pinto Florez — Fifth District affirms without a written explanation

Case
Jose Manuel Pinto Florez v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Boatwright (Ron DeSantis, 2022); KILBANE (Ron DeSantis, 2022)
Date Decided
August 6, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-2927
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jose Manuel Pinto Florez appealed a matter from the Circuit Court for Duval County, where Judge Lindsay L. Tygart presided. The appellate opinion does not identify the particular ruling under review or describe the underlying facts, charges, arguments, or procedural history.

Pinto Florez was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office, and the State was represented by the Attorney General’s Office.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed. Its disposition consisted solely of the word “AFFIRMED” and provided no legal analysis or explanation.

The decision was issued per curiam, with Judges Boatwright, Kilbane, and MacIver concurring. The opinion states that it is not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the matter appealed from the Duval County Circuit Court.
  • The court did not identify the issue presented or explain the basis for affirmance.
  • The per curiam opinion was unanimous among the three listed judges.

Why It Matters

Because the court supplied no reasoning or factual discussion, the opinion announces only the result of this appeal. It offers no articulated rule or analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top