Vines — affirmed the county court’s judgment without a written explanation

Case
Celesa Vines v. Mr. Wills Eastside Auto Sales, Inc.
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
JAY (Ron DeSantis, 2023); WALLIS (Rick Scott, 2013)
Date Decided
August 6, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-1685
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance, Small Claims
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Celesa Vines, proceeding without counsel, appealed from a judgment of the County Court for Duval County in a case involving Mr. Wills Eastside Auto Sales, Inc. The appeal arose from lower tribunal case number 2024-SC-023634.

The Fifth District’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the county court’s ruling, the arguments raised on appeal, or the relief Vines requested. The appellee did not appear in the appellate proceeding.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without analysis or a statement of the legal grounds for its decision. Chief Judge Jay and Judges Wallis and Eisnaugle concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The county court’s judgment remains in place.
  • The appellate court provided no written reasoning or discussion of the issues presented.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The ruling resolves this appeal in favor of Mr. Wills Eastside Auto Sales, Inc., subject to any authorized post-decision motion. Because the court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion supplies no substantive legal analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top