Henriquez — affirmed denial of sentence-correction motion

Case
Juan Pablo Henriquez, Jr. v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Conner (Rick Scott, 2011); Forst (Rick Scott, 2013)
Date Decided
August 6, 2026
Docket No.
4D2026-1058
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Sentencing; Rule 3.800 Motions
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Juan Pablo Henriquez, Jr., proceeding without counsel, appealed an order denying his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 motion. The order came from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, with Judge Sherri Lyn Collins presiding.

The State was not required to appear in the appellate proceeding. The Fourth District’s opinion does not describe Henriquez’s sentence, the arguments raised in his motion, or the circuit court’s reasons for denying relief.

The Court’s Holding

In a per curiam decision, the Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the order denying Henriquez’s Rule 3.800 motion.

The court provided no analysis or explanation for its decision. Judges Conner, Forst, and Klingensmith concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The denial of Henriquez’s Rule 3.800 motion was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s denial of postjudgment sentencing relief intact. Because the opinion contains no reasoning or factual discussion, it offers no substantive guidance on Rule 3.800 beyond the result in Henriquez’s case.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top