Robinson — affirmed the child-support agency’s decision without explanation

Case
Tracy L. Robinson v. State of Florda, Department of Revenue, Child Support Program and Tierra Felton
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
LEWIS (Jeb Bush, 2001); Ray (Rick Scott, 2011)
Date Decided
August 10, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-2530
Topics
Child Support; Administrative Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Tracy L. Robinson appealed from a decision of the Florida Department of Revenue, Child Support Program. The agency’s director was Ann Coffin.

Robinson represented herself on appeal. The Department of Revenue, Child Support Program, and Tierra Felton were the appellees. The opinion provides no facts about the underlying child-support dispute, the agency’s ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the decision under review.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Accordingly, the opinion states no legal reasoning and identifies no particular issue as the basis for affirmance.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the Department of Revenue’s child-support decision.
  • The decision was per curiam, with Judges Lewis, Ray, and M.K. Thomas concurring.
  • Because the court supplied no reasoning, the opinion does not establish how it evaluated any factual or legal issue raised by Robinson.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the Department of Revenue’s decision in place. Its practical significance beyond the parties is limited because the court did not discuss the facts, arguments, or governing law.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top