Melton v. State — affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Tammy Lee Melton v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
MAKAR (Ron DeSantis, 2023); Soud (Ron DeSantis, 2022)
Date Decided
August 11, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-2841
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Tammy Lee Melton appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Marion County in lower-court case number 2024-CF-000863-A. Circuit Judge Robert William Hodges presided below.

The appellate opinion does not identify Melton’s conviction, sentence, arguments on appeal, or the underlying facts. Melton was represented by the Public Defender’s Office, and the State was represented by the Attorney General’s Office.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning, addressed no specific legal issue, and cited no authority. Judges Makar, Soud, and Kilbane concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the judgment against Melton.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without a written explanation.
  • The opinion establishes no stated rule of law and does not disclose the grounds raised on appeal.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s judgment intact, subject to any timely and authorized post-decision motion under the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Because the court supplied no facts or legal analysis, the opinion offers no explanation for the result and little guidance for future cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top