Standing Seam Roofing — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Standing Seam Roofing, LLC, f/k/a Bobby James Roofing and Co., LLC, and Juan Castillo v. East Point Roofing & Metal Sales, Inc., Daphne Evanoff, and Robert C. James
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
OSTERHAUS (Rick Scott, 2013); WINOKUR (Rick Scott, 2015)
Date Decided
August 11, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-1899
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Standing Seam Roofing, LLC, formerly known as Bobby James Roofing and Co., LLC, and Juan Castillo appealed from a judgment or order of the Circuit Court for Franklin County. Circuit Judge Francis J. Allman presided below.

The appellees were East Point Roofing & Metal Sales, Inc., Daphne Evanoff, and Robert C. James. The appellate court’s brief opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the claims asserted, the ruling under review, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision. The disposition was issued per curiam, with Chief Judge Osterhaus and Judges Winokur and Long concurring.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the merits. Accordingly, the opinion establishes only that the judgment or order under review was affirmed; it does not identify a legal rule or explain the basis for the result.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the Franklin County circuit court’s decision.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, legal issues, or rationale for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place, subject to any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331. Because the appellate court supplied no analysis, the opinion offers no substantive guidance beyond the outcome of this appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top