State v. Kahele — Hawaii Supreme Court accepts bond agent’s certiorari petition for argument

Case
State of Hawaiʻi v. Danielle K. Kahele, also known as Danielle K. Kaneao, et al.
Court
Supreme Court of the State of Hawaiʻi
Judge
Vladimir P. Devens (Josh Green, 2023); Sabrina S. McKenna (Neil Abercrombie, 2011)
Date Decided
August 11, 2026
Docket No.
SCWC-24-0000533
Topics
certiorari, bail bonds, appellate procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Arthur Lee, doing business as All In 1 Bonding, was the real party in interest and appellant in four related criminal matters involving defendants Danielle K. Kahele (also known as Danielle K. Kaneao) and Heather Tull.

Lee filed an application for a writ of certiorari on June 12, 2026, seeking Supreme Court review of the related appeals from the Intermediate Court of Appeals.

The Court’s Holding

The Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi accepted Lee’s application for a writ of certiorari under Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes § 602-59(a).

The court did not decide the merits of the underlying disputes. Instead, it ordered that the matter be scheduled for oral argument and stated that the appellate clerk would notify the parties of the schedule.

Key Takeaways

  • The court granted discretionary certiorari review.
  • The order concerns four related appellate matters.
  • No merits ruling was made in this order.

Why It Matters

The order moves the bond agent’s challenge into full Supreme Court review and oral argument. It signals that the court will consider the issues presented, but it establishes no substantive rule at this stage.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top