Broga v. Broga — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Linda Broga v. Glenn Broga
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Rowe (Charlie Crist, 2009); NORDBY (Ron DeSantis, 2019)
Date Decided
August 11, 2026
Docket No.
1D2024-2216
Topics
Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Linda Broga appealed from a judgment or order of the Circuit Court for Leon County, where Circuit Judge Robert R. Wheeler presided. Glenn Broga was the appellee.

The appellate opinion does not identify the nature of the underlying dispute, describe the trial court’s ruling, state the issues raised on appeal, or provide additional procedural facts. Both parties represented themselves on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition.

The court provided no written reasoning, factual analysis, or statement of legal principles. Judges Rowe, Nordby, and Long concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District left the circuit court’s ruling in place.
  • The decision was a per curiam affirmance consisting only of the word “AFFIRMED.”
  • The opinion does not disclose the appellate arguments or explain why the circuit court’s ruling was affirmed.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves this appeal in Glenn Broga’s favor by leaving the circuit court’s ruling undisturbed. Because the court issued no explanatory opinion, the disposition provides no articulated legal reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top