Background
Matthew Kalarovich appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Orange County in lower-tribunal case number 2024-CF-009542. Circuit Judge Amanda S. Bova presided below.
The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying charges, facts, procedural history, issues raised on appeal, or arguments of the parties. Kalarovich was represented by the Public Defender’s Office, and the State was represented by the Attorney General’s Office.
The Court’s Holding
The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.
The court provided no written reasoning and announced no rule of law. Judges Stargel, Wozniak, and White concurred.
Key Takeaways
- The circuit court’s judgment remains in place.
- The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
- The opinion does not identify the appellate issues or disclose the underlying facts and charges.
Why It Matters
The decision resolves Kalarovich’s appeal in the State’s favor, subject to the rehearing period stated in the opinion. Because the court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the legal questions presented.