Adames v. Publix — affirmed the judgment without a written opinion

Case
Jonathan Caba Adames and Zuleima Sanchez v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
NARDELLA (Ron DeSantis, 2023); KAMOUTSAS (Ron DeSantis, 2025)
Date Decided
August 11, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-1374
Topics
Civil Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jonathan Caba Adames and Zuleima Sanchez appealed a judgment of the Circuit Court for Osceola County in their case against Publix Super Markets, Inc. Circuit Judge Tom Young entered the judgment under review.

The appellate court’s decision does not describe the underlying dispute, the trial court’s ruling, the parties’ arguments, or the applicable legal issues.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written opinion or explanation. Judges Nardella, Kamoutsas, and Pratt concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment in favor of the prevailing party remains intact.
  • The appellate court provided no reasoning, factual analysis, or statement of law.
  • The decision was designated not final until the rehearing period expires and any timely rehearing motion is resolved.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends the appeal unless further review or rehearing is available and pursued, but its lack of written reasoning limits its usefulness as guidance on the underlying legal issues.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top