Peck v. Open Door Property D LLC — Sixth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Brody Peck v. Open Door Property D LLC, Robert Burgess, and Anielka Garcia
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
WOZNIAK (Ron DeSantis, 2023); SMITH (Ron DeSantis, 2022)
Date Decided
August 11, 2026
Docket No.
6D2024-1231
Topics
Civil Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Brody Peck appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Orange County in litigation against Open Door Property D LLC, Robert Burgess, and Anielka Garcia. Circuit Judge Margaret H. Schreiber presided in the lower tribunal.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the arguments raised on appeal, or the applicable law.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision. The court issued a per curiam opinion consisting solely of the disposition “AFFIRMED.”

Because the court provided no reasoning, the opinion establishes no stated rationale for the affirmance and does not identify which issues, if any, were resolved on particular legal grounds.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the unspecified circuit-court decision.
  • The court did not explain the factual or legal basis for its ruling.
  • Judges Wozniak, Smith, and Brownlee concurred in the per curiam disposition.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends this stage of the appeal with the circuit court’s decision undisturbed, subject to the stated period for rehearing. Its practical significance beyond the parties is limited because the opinion contains no factual discussion, legal analysis, or articulated rule.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top