Gilbert v. State — affirmed the circuit court without a written explanation

Case
Antonio Terrell Gilbert v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
MIZE (Ron DeSantis, 2022); BROWNLEE (Ron DeSantis, 2023)
Date Decided
August 11, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-2301
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Postconviction Proceedings; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Antonio Terrell Gilbert, proceeding without counsel, appealed from the Circuit Court for Polk County. The appeal arose from lower-tribunal case number 2002-CF-002121-A0XX-XX, before Judge Brenda P. Ramirez.

The Sixth District identified the matter as an appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The opinion does not describe Gilbert’s claims, the circuit court’s ruling, or the underlying facts.

The Court’s Holding

The Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The per curiam opinion consists only of the word “AFFIRMED” and provides no reasoning. Judges Mize, Brownlee, and Gannam concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s ruling remains in effect.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not identify the issues Gilbert raised or establish a stated rule of law.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Gilbert’s appeal in the State’s favor but supplies no written analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases. Its practical significance is therefore limited primarily to the parties and the disposition of this proceeding.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top