Hartsock v. State — affirmed the judgment without a written opinion

Case
Terry Eugene Hartsock, III v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
JAY, C.J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); Makar, J. (appointment info not available); Soud, J. (appointment info not available)
Date Decided
August 13, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-2892
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Terry Eugene Hartsock, III appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Marion County in lower-court case number 2022-CF-004120-A. Circuit Judge Barbara Kissner Kwatkosky presided below.

The Fifth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, facts, arguments, or rulings challenged on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Chief Judge Jay and Judges Makar and Soud concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment remains in effect.
  • The appellate court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues raised.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

This decision resolves Hartsock’s appeal in the State’s favor but does not announce or explain a rule of law. Because the court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion offers no factual or legal analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top