Hale v. State of Florida — First District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Matthew J. Hale v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
LEWIS (Jeb Bush, 2001); Bilbrey (Rick Scott, 2014); WINOKUR (Rick Scott, 2015)
Date Decided
August 14, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-3019
Topics
Per Curiam Affirmance, Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Matthew J. Hale, proceeding without counsel, appealed from the Circuit Court for Bay County, where Judge Timothy Register presided. The State of Florida was the appellee.

The First District’s opinion does not identify the ruling under review, describe the underlying dispute, or state the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The First District affirmed the circuit court in a per curiam decision. The opinion provides no reasoning or further explanation for the affirmance.

Judges Lewis, Bilbrey, and Winokur concurred. The decision was designated nonfinal until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam decision without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not disclose the nature of the underlying case or the ruling reviewed.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Hale’s appeal in the State’s favor but offers no written analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases. Its significance is therefore limited to the disposition reflected in the opinion.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top