Hollagher Group v. Eagle Palms — Second District affirmed without explaining the underlying ruling

Case
Hollagher Group, LLC, and Hollagher Group, LLC, as trustee of the 9140 Moonlit Meadows Land Trust dated the 6th day of February, 2015 v. Eagle Palms Homeowners Association, Inc.
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
SILBERMAN (Jeb Bush, 2001); MORRIS (appointment info not available); BLACK (Charlie Crist, 2010)
Date Decided
August 14, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-1417
Topics
Homeowners Associations; Summary Affirmance; Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Hollagher Group, LLC, individually and as trustee of the 9140 Moonlit Meadows Land Trust, appealed a ruling of the Hillsborough County Circuit Court in litigation involving Eagle Palms Homeowners Association, Inc.

The Second District’s brief opinion does not describe the dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal. It identifies Circuit Judge Jennifer Gabbard as the judge below and cites a related decision, Haught v. Eagle Palms Homeowners Ass’n, No. 2D2025-1403 (Fla. 2d DCA Aug. 7, 2026).

The Court’s Holding

The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling. The court relied on Haught but supplied no independent analysis or explanation of how that decision governed this appeal.

Because the opinion says only “Affirmed,” it does not identify the nature of the ruling under review or articulate a separate legal rule. Judges Silberman, Morris, and Black concurred in the per curiam disposition.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s ruling was affirmed.
  • The Second District cited its August 7, 2026 decision in Haught v. Eagle Palms Homeowners Ass’n as the basis for affirmance.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, the type of ruling affirmed, or the appellate arguments.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves this appeal through a concise affirmance tied to Haught. Attorneys evaluating its significance must consult that cited decision and the underlying record because this opinion provides no substantive reasoning or description of the circuit court’s ruling.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top