Dorsey v. State — First District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Raphael L. Dorsey v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lewis; Winokur; Neff
Date Decided
August 17, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-2129
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance; Pro Se Litigation
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Raphael L. Dorsey appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Bay County, where Circuit Judge Dustin Stephenson presided. Dorsey represented himself on appeal, and the State of Florida appeared through the Attorney General’s office.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the circuit court’s ruling, the arguments raised on appeal, or the relevant procedural history.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues. Judges Lewis, Winokur, and Neff concurred in the disposition.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the Bay County Circuit Court’s decision.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify the appellate issues or establish a stated rule of law.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s decision in place. Because the opinion contains no factual discussion or legal analysis, it offers no explanation of the court’s reasoning for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top