Chenault v. State — First District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Christina Lynn Chenault v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lewis; Bilbrey; Winokur
Date Decided
August 17, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-1891
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance; Florida Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Christina Lynn Chenault appealed a matter from the Circuit Court for Escambia County, where Circuit Judge Amy P. Brodersen presided.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the facts, the claims raised on appeal, or the specific circuit court ruling under review. Chenault was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office; the State made no appearance.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the matter in a per curiam decision. Judges Lewis, Bilbrey, and Winokur concurred.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues. The opinion states that it is not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify the specific circuit court ruling under review or disclose the issues Chenault raised.
  • The decision remains subject to any timely and authorized motion under Florida appellate rules 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Chenault’s appeal at the First District without a reasoned opinion. Because the court supplied no factual or legal analysis, the opinion offers no guidance on the merits beyond the affirmance itself.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top