Garcia v. State — affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Julio Juan Garcia v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Judge
LOGUE; GORDO; BOKOR
Date Decided
August 20, 2026
Docket No.
3D25-2411
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Julio Juan Garcia appealed from a proceeding in the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County before Judge Milton Hirsch. The appellate opinion identifies the lower-tribunal case number as F20-14622B but does not describe the underlying charges, judgment, or issues raised on appeal.

Garcia represented himself. The State was represented by Attorney General James Uthmeier and Assistant Attorney General Daniel Colmenares. The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a).

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The per curiam opinion consists solely of the word “Affirmed” and provides no reasoning, factual analysis, or discussion of Garcia’s appellate arguments. The opinion states that it is not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Key Takeaways

  • The Third District affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.
  • The court issued a per curiam decision without a written explanation.
  • Because the opinion contains no analysis, it does not identify the appellate issues or articulate a legal rule.

Why It Matters

The decision ends Garcia’s appeal in the Third District, subject to any timely rehearing proceedings. Its practical significance is limited to the disposition because the court did not explain the basis for affirmance.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top