Gonzalez — Third District affirmed the county court’s ruling without explanation

Case
Jorge Gonzalez v. Consolidated Real Estate Investments, etc.
Court
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Judge
LOGUE; GORDO; GOODEN
Date Decided
August 20, 2026
Docket No.
3D25-1892
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance, Mobile Home Parks
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jorge Gonzalez appealed from a ruling of the County Court for Miami-Dade County. County Judge Miesha S. Darrough presided over the lower-court proceeding, which carried case number 25-88017-CC-05.

The Third District’s opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, the county court’s ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s ruling in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no factual analysis or explanation of its reasoning. Its disposition cited section 723.061 of the Florida Statutes and Owners of Trailers at Li’l Abner Trailer Park v. CREI Holdings, LLC, 51 Fla. L. Weekly D791 (Fla. 3d DCA Apr. 15, 2026).

Key Takeaways

  • The county court’s ruling was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam opinion without explanatory analysis.
  • The opinion cited section 723.061 of the Florida Statutes and a 2026 Third District decision involving CREI Holdings.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the county court’s ruling in place, but the abbreviated opinion does not disclose the facts or legal reasoning needed to determine the affirmance’s broader significance.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top