Griffin — Sixth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Billy Lewis Griffin v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Nardella, J.; White, J.; Smith, J.
Date Decided
August 25, 2026
Docket No.
6D2024-2160
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Billy Lewis Griffin appealed from a proceeding in the Circuit Court for Orange County before Judge Michael Kraynick. The Sixth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying facts, claims, or ruling under review.

The appellate court resolved the case in a brief per curiam opinion. The opinion identifies Judges Nardella, White, and Smith as concurring.

The Court’s Holding

The Sixth District affirmed. Its disposition consists solely of the word “AFFIRMED.”

The court provided no reasoning, addressed no legal arguments, and identified no specific basis for its decision.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the matter under review.
  • The court issued a per curiam decision with Judges Nardella, White, and Smith concurring.
  • The opinion supplies no facts, legal analysis, or explanation for the affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the ruling under review in place, but the opinion offers no written reasoning for attorneys to evaluate or apply. Any assessment of the underlying issues would require review of the lower-court record and the parties’ appellate filings.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top