Geick Smith v. Geick — Fifth District affirmed the nonfinal order without a written explanation

Case
Nicole Michelle Geick Smith v. Brandon Michael Geick
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Makar; Edwards; Harris
Date Decided
August 27, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-1096
Topics
Family Law, Nonfinal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Nicole Michelle Geick Smith appealed a nonfinal order entered in a proceeding against Brandon Michael Geick in the Circuit Court for Citrus County. Circuit Judge Richard A. Howard presided below.

Smith represented herself on appeal. Geick was represented by Christopher V. Carlyle of The Carlyle Appellate Law Firm. The appellate opinion does not describe the challenged order, the parties’ arguments, or the underlying facts.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the nonfinal order.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance consisting only of the word “AFFIRMED” and provided no reasoning or discussion of the legal issues. Judges Makar, Edwards, and Harris concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s nonfinal order.
  • The decision was unanimous among the three identified panel judges.
  • Because the opinion contains no analysis, it does not disclose the grounds for affirmance or resolve any stated legal question in a written opinion.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the challenged nonfinal order in place. Its broader significance is limited because the court did not identify the issue presented or explain its reasoning.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top