Thomas v. State — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Jeffery Darnell Thomas v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Kelly; Black; Labrit
Date Decided
August 28, 2026
Docket No.
2D2024-2934
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jeffery Darnell Thomas appealed from a ruling of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge Samantha Lee Ward presided. The appellate opinion does not identify the offense, the challenged ruling, or the arguments Thomas raised.

Thomas was represented on appeal by Special Assistant Public Defender Andrea Flynn Mogensen. The State was represented by Attorney General James Uthmeier and Assistant Attorney General J. Wade Stidham.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues presented. Judges Kelly, Black, and Labrit concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District left the circuit court’s ruling in place.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without an explanatory opinion.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, appellate claims, or legal basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends this appeal with the challenged circuit court decision intact, but its summary form offers no substantive guidance on Florida law.

Because the court did not explain its reasoning, the opinion cannot be used to determine how the panel evaluated any particular factual or legal issue raised by Thomas.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top