Irish v. State — Second District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Benjamin Irish v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Northcutt; LaRose; Sleet
Date Decided
August 28, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-2358
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Benjamin Irish appealed from a judgment or order of the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, where Judge Julie L. Sercus presided. The opinion does not describe the underlying charges, procedural history, appellate arguments, or relief Irish sought.

Irish was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office and also appeared pro se. The State was represented by the Florida Attorney General’s Office.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion. Judges Northcutt, LaRose, and Sleet concurred.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues presented. Accordingly, the opinion establishes only that the judgment or order under review was affirmed; it does not identify the legal basis for that result.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The ruling was issued per curiam, with all three identified panel judges concurring.
  • Because the court supplied no analysis, the opinion does not resolve any stated legal question or explain why affirmance was warranted.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this appeal in the State’s favor while leaving the trial court’s ruling intact. Its broader precedential value is limited because the court did not provide facts, legal analysis, or a statement of the issues decided.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top