McMullen — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Charles McMullen v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Osterhaus, C.J.; Ray, J.; M.K. Thomas, J.
Date Decided
August 28, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-1078
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Charles McMullen appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County, where Judge Clifton Alan Drake presided. The State of Florida was the appellee.

The First District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, facts, procedural history, issues raised on appeal, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition.

The court provided no written analysis or explanation of its ruling. Chief Judge Osterhaus and Judges Ray and M.K. Thomas concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written opinion.
  • The disposition identifies no legal issue, rule, or rationale supporting the result.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s decision in place, but the absence of a written explanation limits the decision’s usefulness as guidance on the underlying legal issues.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top