Lopez v. State — Second District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling without explanatory analysis

Case
Alexsi Serpas Lopez v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Northcutt; LaRose; Sleet
Date Decided
August 28, 2026
Docket No.
2D2024-2198
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance, Florida Courts
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Alexsi Serpas Lopez appealed from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge Mark D. Kiser presided.

The Second District’s brief opinion does not identify the underlying ruling, describe the facts, or state the issues Lopez raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The court issued its decision per curiam and provided no explanatory analysis. Judges Northcutt, LaRose, and Sleet concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s ruling remains in effect.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, issues, or nature of the ruling under review.
  • The appellate court provided no reasoning for its affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Lopez’s appeal in the State’s favor but supplies no substantive analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top