Carwise v. State — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Marquise Veandre Carwise v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lucas, C.J.; Khouzam, J.; Morris, J.
Date Decided
August 28, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-2916
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Marquise Veandre Carwise appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, where Circuit Judge Michelle Sisco presided.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the challenged ruling, the arguments raised on appeal, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Chief Judge Lucas and Judges Khouzam and Morris concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District left the circuit court’s decision in place.
  • The opinion provides no factual discussion or legal reasoning.
  • The court did not identify or resolve any legal issue in a written analysis.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends this appeal with an affirmance, but its lack of reasoning limits its usefulness to attorneys seeking guidance on the underlying legal issues.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top