Brown v. State — First District Court of Appeal affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Damian J. Brown v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Osterhaus, C.J.; Lewis, J.; Winokur, J.
Date Decided
September 1, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-0628
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Damian J. Brown appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Alachua County, where Circuit Judge David Philip Kreider presided.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the challenged ruling, the arguments raised, or the procedural history beyond identifying the matter as an appeal from the circuit court.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without an explanatory opinion. Accordingly, the decision states no legal reasoning and identifies no specific issue resolved beyond leaving the lower court’s ruling in place.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The ruling was unanimous among Chief Judge Osterhaus and Judges Lewis and Winokur.
  • The opinion provides no facts, analysis, or explanation for the affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal in the First District by leaving the circuit court’s ruling undisturbed, subject to disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Because the court gave no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance about the underlying legal issues.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top