Schultz v. Florida State Hospital — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Nicholas Schultz v. Florida State Hospital
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Osterhaus, C.J.; Lewis, J.; Winokur, J.
Date Decided
September 1, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-1746
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Nicholas Schultz appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Gadsden County, where Circuit Judge David Frank presided. Schultz represented himself on appeal, and the Florida Attorney General’s Office represented Florida State Hospital.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the underlying claims, the circuit court’s ruling, the arguments on appeal, or the relief Schultz sought.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition.

The court provided no reasoning, discussed no legal issues, and announced no rule of law. Chief Judge Osterhaus and Judges Lewis and Winokur concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision remains in place.
  • The appellate court affirmed without a written explanation of its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts or identify the issues presented on appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Schultz’s appeal in Florida State Hospital’s favor but offers no substantive guidance for other litigants or courts. Because the disposition contains no reasoning, its significance is limited to the result in this case.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top