Montone v. Department of Health — affirmed the agency decision without explanation

Case
Adam Montone v. Department of Health
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Black; Atkinson; Smith
Date Decided
September 2, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-1869
Topics
Administrative Law; Health Regulation; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Adam Montone appealed a decision of the Florida Department of Health to the Florida Second District Court of Appeal. Montone represented himself, while Chief Appellate Counsel Sarah Young Hodges represented the Department.

The court’s brief per curiam opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the Department’s ruling, Montone’s arguments, or the applicable legal standards.

The Court’s Holding

The Second District affirmed the Department of Health’s decision.

The court provided no reasoning or additional explanation for its disposition. Judges Black, Atkinson, and Smith concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Department of Health’s decision remains in effect.
  • The court resolved the appeal through an unexplained per curiam affirmance.
  • The opinion establishes no stated rule or analysis concerning the underlying administrative dispute.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this appeal in the Department’s favor, but its lack of factual discussion or legal reasoning limits its usefulness as guidance in other health-regulation or administrative-law matters.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top