Head v. State — Fifth District affirmed the judgment without a written opinion

Case
Deriel Head v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Jay, C.J.; Kilbane, J.; MacIver, J.
Date Decided
September 1, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-3799
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance; Florida Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Deriel Head appealed a judgment from the Circuit Court for Duval County, where Circuit Judge Meredith Charbula presided. The underlying circuit-court case number was 2024-CF-006819-A.

The Fifth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the charge, facts, procedural history, arguments raised on appeal, or relief Head requested.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision. Chief Judge Jay and Judges Kilbane and MacIver concurred.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues. The decision therefore establishes only that the judgment under review was affirmed, subject to disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.
  • The panel issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify the appellate issues or disclose the underlying facts.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s judgment in place but offers no legal analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases. Because the opinion does not reveal the issues presented or the panel’s reasoning, its significance is confined principally to the disposition of Head’s appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top