Martin — affirmed the lower court’s ruling without a written explanation

Case
Tammy Lorraine Martin v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Stargel; Nardella; Pratt
Date Decided
September 1, 2026
Docket No.
6D2024-1455
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Tammy Lorraine Martin appealed from a ruling of the Circuit Court for Charlotte County, where Judge Shannon H. McFee presided. The appellate opinion identifies the lower-tribunal matter as case number 2023-CF-1029.

The opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the issues Martin raised on appeal, or the precise nature of the ruling under review.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court’s ruling. The decision was issued per curiam, with Judges Stargel, Nardella, and Pratt concurring.

The court provided no reasoning or legal analysis and did not identify any specific ground for affirmance.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the lower court’s ruling.
  • The court issued a per curiam decision without an explanatory opinion.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, appellate arguments, or basis for the court’s decision.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal in the State’s favor at the panel level, subject to the period for filing a motion for rehearing and disposition of any timely motion.

Because the court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the legal issues presented and should not be read as resolving questions beyond the result in this case.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top